X
Skip to content

Premier League Picks Matchday 4 | Premier League Odds, Soccer Predictions & Free Tips

Premier League Picks

Flash:

Welcome to the BetUS soccer channel, I’m Flash. It’s Premier League show, it’s match day four, which means we’ve got three games to have a little look back on. And we will be looking back, because I tell you what happened last weekend. Chelsea not winning, Liverpool not winning, Man City not winning. I can’t remember when all three of them just drew such a blank. But first of all, we’re America’s favorite sportsbook , so I’d like to invite you to subscribe and get us closer to 10,000. I think next week it’ll be 6,000, and then before we know it, we’ll be at that glorious 10. Also, I’d like you to ring the bell. Ring the bell means that we’ll notify you and you’ll never miss any content again. If you’re on social media, then please follow @BetUSTV, cover every single sport there. And if I told you about the sports, I’d be here till next week. It rolls off like the Magna Carta.

There’s a link in description. Press that if you want to be entered into the shirts, we’ve got another week to go. So again, go there, do what you got to do, and then I will pick four winners, and you can pick any shirt from any of the four shows. Listen, it might be four Premier League shirts. It might be for Bundesliga shirts, but the choice is yours. Also, we’re going to have a prop of the week and a Q&A, so get yourselves in the chat and make sure that you’re plenty active.

I’m going to come to my award winning owner of We Love Betting in Mark O’Hare. His sidekick is European odds compiler, Mark Stinchcombe, who will be known as Stinch, if you are new. If not, he’s the one that looks like Eminem, and the other one, he looks like Jimmy Summerfield, if you are a bit older. You don’t like that, Mark O’Hare, do you?

Mark:

I don’t know who it is.

Flash:

Don’t leave me this way. Don’t leave me this way. Do you remember him?

Mark:

Yeah. Yeah.

Flash:

You do, see, that’s why you’re not happy. Anyway, Mark O’Hare, talk to me. Leeds, absolutely outstanding. Beat up Chelsea, got what they deserved, especially with a helping hand from the keeper, Man City, and Newcastle. Neither of had let a goal in, then a six goal thriller. Then I want to open up with Bournemouth. Bournemouth played Arsenal last week. Did not lay a glove on them from the very first minute. They’re down if they think that’s the way to play in the Premier League.

Mark:

Yeah. Well, if we rewind a week, we were sort of discussing the potential of chucking all of those big teams into a multi really, a parlay. And I couldn’t really find an obvious reason not to back it by then. This is football. One of these teams is likely to probably let us down in some way or form. Didn’t expect all three big guns to do so. Chelsea in such an awful way, away at Elland Road. But yeah, you’re right about Bournemouth, had worries and concerns about them coming into the start of the season. Obviously, no Solanke against Arsenal, which didn’t help their case, but to be two goals down within a quarter of an hour, you’re never going to get your way back into a game like that against the talented opponents like Arsenal. So it’s going to be an uphill task for them. I’ve never been a big fan of Scott Parker as a head coach.

I know he’s got two promotions on his CV, but he’s quite pragmatic, and he just feels a bit assured of himself. I’m not really sure he’s got the tools at his disposal, but he probably wants a bit more, obviously. But I’m just not sure in terms of stylistic, what his teams tend to offer when they get promoted. So, compare and contrast with others. Nottingham Forest for example, is Steve Cooper. I think we’re all pretty confident that they are going to be okay, Clutcher’s new signings, but also it’s just the coach, really, you’re investing in there. I think he’s tried and tested, knows exactly what he’s trying to do and how he’s going to get there. Whereas Parker, I’m just not seeing that at the moment. So it’s going to be a tough and a long season for Bournemouth, if they continue to play in the same way as they did last week.

Flash:

Yeah. A 100% agree. Stinch, it’s all about body language. Forest, high tempo, aggression, even if they’re not actually scoring goals, and they’re a bit fortunate to score last week against Everton. But Leeds: energy, aggression, and it’s almost like, Okay, we know we’re in a dog fight. We know we cannot match these technically, but we can more than match them in work rate. And then you look at Brentford, but then you go back to Bournemouth and after the first whistle, they laid back and said, Okay. I don’t even know what their game plan was. It’s almost as if they’d already been beaten. It was almost embarrassing.

Stinch:

Yeah. And not just that game, really. They didn’t really deserve to pick up anything from the Villa game, opening day of the season. I know they won 2-0, but they’re very fortunate in terms of the chance. They’re just not creating any chances. And if you’re not creating any chances, you’re not going to win football matches, and the points are going to be no good to them at the end of the season in a lot of games. And it doesn’t get any easier for them. They got Liverpool away this weekend, albeit a Liverpool team disrupted by injuries, but still you’d expect that the 11 that Liverpool put out on Monday night, if it’s a similar 11 to the one on the weekend against Bournemouth, they’ll put up a much better show than they did previously.

Yeah, I think we discussed Bournemouth on the season preview, that we rule pretty confident probably that it might just finish bottom, not just get relegated, but finish bottom of the pile. So they probably need to change the way they go. But I think Mark talks about it as well on the season preview that they haven’t done that much business. Maybe their hands are a little bit tied financially. So it could just be a case of a Norwich, or a Fulham or a Watford. They’ll go back down to the Championship, regroup, and then probably get promoted again, something like that. Difficult to see how they can maybe consolidate, when the standard of the Premier League is just getting higher and higher every season.

Flash:

Okay. Let’s have a little look at the records, because the boys did all right. Stinch jumped in, nicked a couple and moved on again. Got off to a dodgy old start myself at minus 4.85. Prop had a week at minus 117. But thanks to my partners, we’re still above water at 0.85. Got robbed last week, Mendy chucking one in, Man City not doing the business, it was an absolute shocker. And then let’s not talk about Jordan Pickford parrying the ball back into the middle of the goal. And I had Forest not to score as well. So it’s a change of tack this week, but we’re up after three weeks as a team. I’ve just got to start rowing in the same direction. Make sure you get yourselves in the chat, thumbs up by the way. And obviously if you’ve got any questions, then wait for the Q&A, but you can comment as we go. Let’s go with the first game, because the first game is on the south coast.

It’s normally a graveyard, this, for the visitors. I don’t know what to expect in this game. So Hampton versus Man United. So Hampton a massive plus 335, Man United minus 130. Were minus 115 during the game against Liverpool, where they actually turned up, but Liverpool, they weren’t no great shakes. So don’t be reading too much into that handicap. Southampton plus a half. So basically, Southampton double chance of not getting beat at plus 110. Look at the total, though. Three at minus 105, the unders favorite, minus 115. The draw could be a runner at plus 310. Mark O’Hare, Manchester United visiting the south coast. That is not a happy hunting ground for them. Is this just that both teams are scoring over and don’t care who wins?

Mark:

I found this game really tricky, to be honest. I found actually the whole card in the primarily quite tricky this time around. But yeah, I think United obviously massively improved against Liverpool. All the prerequisites you look for in terms of effort and desire and work rate were there. And they went with a game plan and executed it very well. But this is a completely different test going to St. Mary’s. You can’t play on the counter attack. You can’t fling balls in behind and expect your runners to cause problems. Southampton will be wise to that. They were not going to be as loose as Liverpool would be. Are they going to chuck in Casimiro straight into that midfield after the performance of Monday night? Possibly. We don’t know yet, but the defense did look more at home at least, and they looked a bit more balanced about what they did.

Saints haven’t been fantastic, it must be said, and in two of those games, they’ve had to claw their way back in from losing positions, but they’re going to match United in all those kind of prerequisites I talked about. Effort, distances, speed, physicality, and they can be a pressing machine of their own. So this is going to be a completely different challenge to what United have experienced on Monday night. So I have no desire to gack United at those prices at all. I still think we need time to see how Eric Tenhard’s teams evolve this season. And you mentioned it can be a graveyard for United. Well, actually, since Housinger et al took charge, Saint’s record at home to top six finishes is pretty decent for a team who’ve been sort of battling around the bottom six. They’ve won six, drawn seven, and lost nine last season in Liverpool, and Chelsea won here.

They’ve taken points off United in two of the last three seasons, but what’s most remarkable, really, is how quickly they tend to start against the big teams. So of those 22 games against the top six at St. Mary’s, they’ve led at half time on nine occasions, scored first in 13, and scored before half time in 14. Last season, they scored before half time in five of those six games, too. So I was looking at ways to try and get Southampton onside in terms of halftime markets, but I just couldn’t find anything to really sort of hang my hat on. But United have led a half time in just four away games in the Premier League since the start of last season. They’ve only won six of those in 90 minutes anyhow, kept three clean sheets, and conceded before half time at 60%.

So there’s a lot going against United there, and just need to be of proved that they’re on this journey now after one game. At the moment I’m noncommittal, really, but on the goals line, as you mentioned, all I’d say is, of those kind of games against the big six teams, Saints do tend to be a bit more restrained in their approach. They’re not quite as loose, and 13 of the last 16 hosting big six teams, they’re featured under two and a half goals. So it kind of just put me off a little bit in the terms of the goal markets. Couldn’t make my mind up either way. If I had to, I’d probably back Saints with a three quarter goal start. It just means if they do lose by exactly one goal, we’re going to lose half of our stake. You’re sort of winning if Southampton win or draw. But I’m just kind of using it as a watching brief. Intrigued to see how United go.

Flash:

Stinch, let’s throw Southampton out the window at the moment. Okay? Let’s just concentrate on Man United. They’re the worse side in Premier League history last week, then they go and beat a Liverpool side who put in their worst performance I’ve seen in the last five years, by the way. Talk about two sides that were disjointed. I thought if Liverpool had scored the first goal against Man United, Liverpool would probably have gone on and won that game as well. Now all of a sudden that we’ve got to be thinking of taking Man United at minus 130 at a ground where they don’t normally get anything. Surely Southampton double chance at plus 110, leave it alone, or maybe find something else.

Stinch:

Yeah, I think you can’t really take one football match in a massive spread of games as the true ability and desire application. Because we’ve seen a number of times when Man United, they put in a good performance or get good result and they don’t back it up. I mean, under Sochard, they’ve won at PSG. They’ve won at Man City. They’ve won at Chelsea, but he wasn’t successful overall, was he? They are capable of putting in these good performances. So they do have good players, and football is a low scoring game. So sometimes you can get away with just moments of magic or a good half an hour or something. And then if the other team doesn’t show up, then obviously it’s going to make life easier for you. There’s no way we can touch Man United at these prices. Lost the last seven away games in a row. Nothing would want me to get them on side at these odds. You mentioned they struggle against Southampton. They actually end beaten in their last 14 away matches at Southampton, but I wouldn’t really read too much into that. A lot of that probably would be even when Ferguson was in charge.

Flash:

FA card, Caribo card.

Stinch:

Yeah. It’s nothing to read into, but when we’re focused too much on head-to-head. I think I found a cracking bet in the props market, to be honest, Man United to get over 1.5 cards at plus 100.

Flash:

We had them the other night. That was our prop bet the other night, with Man United over two and half yellows. That cashed as well. So, over two and a half the other night was at minus 120, minus 125. Now you’re found over one and a half at plus 100?

Stinch:

Yeah, it looks massive to me. They picked up three, four and four so far under Tenhard. Maybe some of the players are trying to impress him, or maybe some of them are getting over aggressive as they try and battle back from negative positions within the match. The referee in this is a below average carder, Andy Madley, but he did show two to United last time he reffed them at Brighton in May. They were shown by the 47th minute. So if you can do that in pretty much half a game, don’t think it’s too much to ask in 90 minutes. They picked up three here last season, Man United, four in the reverse fixture, old Trafford. So there might be a few players that basically have been squaring up in the past, and some of United players, we know they’ve they know they’ve got short fuses, so they might rear their head again.

And the big one for me, really, is this bet as won in 15 of Man United’s last 20 away games since the beginning of last season. It’s a 75% strike rate. Just incredible when you get an odds of plus 100. You look at the amount of cards they’ve picked up since the beginning of last season, they’ve picked up 88 in 41 games, so an average of 2.15 per game. If you use that sort of as a blanket input in terms of trying to calculate the true odds, you’d get closer to minus 170. So the fact you can get a plus 100, I can’t see any reason not to back it.

Flash:

No, of course. I mean, you can even have a straight red and that’ll take you straight over the one and a half, as well. And the only downside to that is no Luke Shore, no McGuire. Are we expecting either of them to come back, or are we expecting Man United to go with, okay, you did the job last week, you keep the shirt? And you go again, Mark O’Hare.

Mark:

Oh, I don’t expect those two players to be back in the team anytime soon, particularly after Monday’s performance. Alessandro Martin has kind of stamping his authority on the game within the first couple of minutes, really, with that sort of bump against Mosala. You could tell the players were banging up for that game. And that’s what I mean. This is a completely different challenge. You get yourself up for a home game in front of your fans against Liverpool and then have to go to the early kickoff at Southampton. It’s a tricky one, really, but I like Stinch’s angle. Andy Madley would be the only sort of negative you could find for that, but the proven record of United away from home and collecting cards is a massive positive. So yeah, I expect the same again from United. I guess the big question mark is Casa Miro. I wouldn’t be too surprised if Marshal comes in now for Alanga now he’s fully fit, but I don’t expect massive changes.

Flash:

Yeah. Southampton, are you full? But they are a little bit naive as well. I’ve had to leave the game alone, but it’s just one of those looking after the event, whatever your thought process is, you could well be right come the end of the game. It’s just whether you are right prior to the game. Let’s have a little look at the official pick, because there’s only one. Myself and Mark O’Hare have had to dodge this one, because we can’t trust the visitors and we can’t trust the hosts. Man United, over 1.5 cards at plus 100. Well, I tell you what, I’ll eat my hat if that’s still plus 100 come kickoff, by the way, because I’m fancying that’s probably, we could be here till next Sunday and not find better value. Surely Man United get two cards and you get paid at plus 100. Okay.

Let’s move on. Because this game is a really, really tricky game for me. I thought that the home side were too obvious. It’s Brentford versus Everton. Now, Brentford are plus 100. We’re just talking about plus 100 being great value. That looks great value on the back of them scoring four against Manchester United the last time they were at home. Everton at plus 285, and totals at two and a half. And over again is at plus 100. We are being sucked in, here. There’s either a few traps, or there’s gifts, it’s an early Christmas present. Draw is at plus 260. Stinch, take us away, because the one thing you can’t say about Everton is that they’re not together at the back, because they’ve defended really well. It was only a mistake last week that at Foresting, and the one thing you say about Brentford, is they will test you at the back.

Stinch:

Yep. I’m happy to oppose Everton once again, to be honest, as a Frank Lampard Everton, especially away from home, failed to win 16 of their last 17 away games since Lampard took over. It’s eight defeats in 10 away. They conceded the most goals in that period were 25. So of an average of 2.5 against. Obviously we know their issues in terms of players missing. And I know you mentioned about they look organized or whatever, but it’s three matches. They’re still considered two goals away at Villa, a Villa team that aren’t very cohesive. So I’m happy to continue to oppose them. At some point, they’ve got to attack in football matches. They can’t can’t continue where they are. What, they got one point from three games? Stuck near the bottom. They can’t continue. And so basically my decision here was, do I back Brentford or do I back Brentford to score two plus at similar odds, minus 105? I’ve gone with the latter, just because I’m not sure I can trust Brentford at those odds. You kind of alluded to it.

I could easily see a two-two here or Brentford maybe even losing. I don’t know where the Everton goals are going to come from, but I know Brentford are capable of conceding goals, but yeah, I just think the safer bet is basically to back Brentford goals. I think you’re just basically removing Brentford one nil, and I’m quite happy to go with that, to be honest. They scored two against both Fullham and Leicester, and didn’t win either of those games. Again, that kind of leads me towards, I’d rather focus on them to score goals rather than keep them out. I did wonder about the departure of Christian Ericsson, but I don’t think it seems to affected them very much, because it’s obviously scored four against Man United. They got a bit more personnel going forward rather than solely relying on Ivan Tony and Brian and Breymer. Youam Visser, Jamie Silver, both back from full fitness. After disrupted campaigns, they bought in Damsda from Samturia, Keen Lewis partner from Hull, two really, really exciting dynamic forwards. And Brentford themselves have scored two plus in 10 of their last 14 matches, and Everton have conceded two plus in 15 of the last 21 away games. So 71% strike rate, and the odds here are closer to 50%. So very, very easy bet for me, Brentford to score over 1.5 goals.

Flash:

Yeah, it’s hard not to be really impressed, Mark O’Hare, with the way that Brentford go about their games. Home or away, they say, listen, we expect to let goals in, but we definitely expect to score them. I’m wondering if this is all too obvious, and Everton go there just to get a point on the board and its frustrations.

Mark:

Yeah, possibly. I mean, that’s more Everton team to do under Frank Lambard, isn’t it? Just try and park, the bus and scratch something away at the other end. But for me, it’s just led by price, really. And Brentford at plus 100 is absolutely fair enough. Just kind of take out the emotion, really. I had sort of concerns about backing Aston Villa at home to Everton a couple of weeks back, and they were minus 135, minus 130 in that match. I don’t think there’s a huge difference between what Aston Villa are and where Brentford are right now. I think they’re pretty similarly rated. Even if Villa do have the more quality individuals, we can see that they’re sort of going a little bit around in circles right now under Steven Gerard, whereas Brentford are a smart team, know exactly what they’re doing and how they’re going to go about it.

So yeah, I backed them plus a quarter at Fulham last weekend, and they were well beaten, in fairness, despite the winning goal coming late on. Marginal offside go against them. But I think there’s been reasonable signs to suggest that they’ve had a very good start to the season. They were much the better team at the king power on the opening day. Obviously blue United away as well, at home. And as Stinch has already alluded to, this is Everton away from home. So it’s just been a continuation of the awful performances we’ve seen last season. They were pretty uninspiring when losing at Aston Verne until they had to sort of chase the game later on. They had 19 shots against Forest last week, which looks really good on paper, but actually where are those shots coming from? Non-threatening areas. And you’ve got Ron Don as the only fit center forward. It’s just their lack of ability, really, to convert anything that they produce or can sort of conjure up in the final third, which is the big concern for me.

And that’s why I can’t see Everton scoring twice. And if Brentford do score twice, I’ll happily back to win the game. So Everton, as we know, were the worst away team in the Premier League last season. They posted two wins, four draws and 14 defeats in that time, kept three clean sheets, conceding 2.15 goals per game on average. On only four occasions have they scored multiple goals in the last 20 away days. And under Lampard alone, he tries to shift the blame elsewhere, but their away record in 10 away games under Lampard is eight defeats, one win, and one draw. They’ve got the worst expected points return away from home under Lampard, and I think Southampton are giving up a higher expected goals figure, as well. So it’s pretty damning stuff. And Brentford did the double over them last season or took four points off them. At home, they won five of seven when welcoming bottom seven teams. At the moment, it’s very difficult to suggest Everton won’t be a bottom seven team. And Brentford at home tend to be, I wouldn’t say reliable, but good enough to go and get results in this kind of fixture. So, happy to take the plus 100 on the home win.

Flash:

I just think that Frank Lampard turns up, goes 541 or 550, tries to stifle Brentford. Brentford have plenty energy, dangerous from set pieces as well. And them set pieces come from long throws, from free kicks, from corners. Yeah, I mean the plus 100, I’m looking forward to watching this game again. I’ve seen Everton in every game so far, and they’ve underwhelmed in every one. And last week, all I did was just keep a clean sheet, I don’t care if you draw nil-nil. And they failed to do that, as well. So yeah, I mean maybe Brentford at plus 100 is the way to go, or if they score twice, you expect them to win the game. Unless we find a little two-two, but good luck. So let’s have a little look at the official Soccer picks , because it’s lopsided, really. It’s Brentford money line at plus 100 from Mark O’Hare, and for Stinch, it’s Brentford to score twice, minimum of twice, at minus 105.

So really, it’s Brentford all the way. Nice 2-1, 2-0, if you want to… Can we see Everton scoring? It’s really strange the way Everton are playing at the moment as well, because they all seem to be trying to do too much. Just get them to play two touch, or just clear it out of their danger areas. Okay. Now, let’s move on to this next game. It’s on the south coast, and I’m really interested in this, because it’s Brighton versus Leeds, and both of these sides have been impressive. Leads scored twice on the last time they visited the south coast at Southampton, but only picked up a point. Then last week we know exactly what they did to Chelsea, and it was fully deserved, by the way. From the first whistle, they were out like greyhounds, and they really put them under pressure, and fully deserved a three-nil victory. Brighton, on the other hand, it doesn’t matter who they play, they are more than a match for this season, and Brighton are minus 115.

Leeds are a massive plus 310. You got to go straight down the bottom for a draw at plus 285. The over two and a half at minus 120, I think that’s where we need to start, Mark O’Hare, because I think both of these sides are going to show very little respect, and I think they’re both capable of scoring. The big thing for me is, I think Brighton have got the edge, because after the Lordmere show, Leeds might just have to come down to earth with a bump.

Mark:

Yeah. I found this get really, really tricky. I think you could make a strong case of Brighton being worthy, odds on favorites. Their performances so far this season have been very, very good. They’ve won all the sort of high attacking metrics in all three games, collected seven points from a tricky set of fixtures. Probably deserve more, in fairness. They absolutely dominated Newcastle at the Annex last time out, as well. And they’ve done it all despite losing their two best players from last season, in Vesuma and Kirkerella. So just further proof for Graham Potter, what he’s doing there, and how the club operates, they’re doing it in the right way. The fact that they’re using Leo Trossard successfully as a left wingback just shows the versatility and flexibility in that squad. And I think they went a little bit under the radar last season. I’ve said it before, but if you take out the six game losing streak they suffered through February and March, they only actually lost five of 32 Premier League games outside of that, which is incredible, really.

But do I feel confident backing Brighton at minus money? And the honest answer is no, because they’ve only won five times at the Amex in home Premier League games since the start of last season. It scored multiple goals on only six occasions in that sequence average, just 1.15 points and 0.95 goals. So neither trend is anything new. We’ve known Brighton have been capable of putting in really solid, strong performances and dominating most of the matches, but just incapable of really turning those promising performances into points at home. Doesn’t tend to work the other way around. They seem to be okay when they go away from home. But that’s just a kind of question mark over them right now for me, and makes me leave them alone this weekend.

Leeds, yeah, they were absolutely excellent against Chelsea, who were absolutely dreadful, too. So they’ve had an excellent points return. I think Jesse Marsh has been vindicated so far, and it’s nice to see him getting some good press after some of the nonsense that went round at the end of last season. But yeah, they’ve got to meet the same sort of challenge here. They’ve got to be as physical, show the same sort of tenacity as well, the same work rates. But just an interesting kind of spectator here, I couldn’t find anything I really wanted to hang my hat on. And I’m not sure if you guys have, but I found this a really difficult game to sort of unpack.

Flash:

Yeah. I found an angle because I want to be with the home side, but I don’t want to be with the home side at minus 115, stinch. Now, can we go with Leeds last week? They were handed the first goal, and it came at a time when Leeds were on top. Mindy doesn’t make that mistake. They don’t score for another five or 10 minutes, and all of a sudden the frustrations, and we see a completely different game. Are we going a little bit overboard? Because it’s almost like there was a house of cards for Chelsea last week. So as soon as Leeds scored, bang, Leeds were always going to be the winners, because they absolutely dominated all over the part. I don’t think one Chelsea player won an individual battle. Now, can we go too much? Because now they’re going to a side that shift the ball quickly, two touch. And they’re very, very tough to beat.

Stinch:

Yeah. Similar to Man United, really. Don’t want to base our overall opinion of the team on one match. I don’t think Leeds maybe would’ve been affected by not scoring the goal that you mentioned, because they were always the underdogs, and the atmosphere at Ellen Road with that crowd is always vociferous, and no way the fans would turn on the team. So yeah, I still think Leeds maybe would’ve perhaps gone on and win. I’m quite anti Chelsea at the moment, with having got rid of Verna and Nokarku. So it wasn’t a huge surprise that they’ve underwhelmed at times already in their first three games. But yeah, it’s going to be a bit annoying for regular viewers, but I just can’t really make any bets based on Leeds without Patrick Banford. Again, I know they won three nil last week, but as you mentioned, one goal was gifted.

The other two were, well, one was a set piece. The other was kind of a bit of a scramble. So again, I don’t want to say, okay, yeah, they’ll be fine without Banford, because we saw for long periods last season that they struggled without somebody up front. Rodrigo started the season well, but he’s a bit of a streaky player. He’s not always been the most consistent. So yeah, I wouldn’t want to get with Leeds, but again, Mark’s right. I think this Brighton price is a little bit short based on the stats and the facts that he reeled off. I thought it was quite interesting. The games between these two, you’d normally expect games involving Leeds to feature goals, but they’ve played each other four times since Leeds came back to the Premier League, and it’s finished one-one, nil-nil, two-nil Brighton, one-nil Brighton. So they’ve all been very low scoring games. So I’d be interested to see the angle that you’ve come up with, Flash.

Flash:

Well, I didn’t want to go near, and I don’t want to be going near, any teams to not score, because I found ways to beat myself last week, the keeper dribbling on his own one yard line. And then I’ve got another keeper who tries to palm it out and palms it straight to the opposition forward. But I’ve gone with Brighton to win this game in under four and a half. I don’t see their five goals. That brings in the one-nil Brighton, but it’s a plus money. And if it’s a plus money just for Brighton in under four and half, then basically I’m beating the market that’s sub minus 115. I’m really impressed with the way Brighton play, and Leeds, I’d want to see a little bit more of them. I’m not sure they can press away from home like they did at home.

And if there’s one team that’s built to play through midfield, play round corners, it’s Brighton. So the official pick for me is for Brighton to win and under four and a half goals. And that is at plus 110, and boy, do I need a winner. So I’ve got a little bit conservative. I think Brighton win the game, not at minus 115, but under four and a half as well at plus 110. Okay. Let’s move on to game number four, because this side are sitting top of the league. So we need to be giving them all the credit they deserve. It’s the London Derby, it’s Arsenal versus Fullham. Arsenal minus 310, no thank you. Fullham at plus 850, no draw is at plus 465 under three goals. Do we see four goals in this game? Because if you do, you’re going to get paid at minus 125. The under is at plus 105. Stinch, Arsenal. Do they win by two clear goals? Because even that is at minus 120.

Stinch:

I think there’s just a watch and brief, to be honest, because it’s only Fullham’s fourth game back in the Premier League, and they’ve been massively different to when they were last in the Premier League. They’re pressing the opposition. They’re showing aggression. They’re not sitting back. They’re taking game to the opponent. We saw, I think, perfect example when they played Liverpool at home, took the game to Liverpool, and we were rewarded/ they got a good win against a good Brentford team that we’ve already talked about last week. So they’ve already got wins on the board. They’ve already got points. And yeah, okay, Arsenal are at the top of the league, but should we give them the winning the league in August trophy? I don’t think it really means anything at this stage. And they’re very short price here, as well. I think we spoke about last week you asked, I think, can we trust Arsenal at these short prices?

I think the answer is, well, it’s all about the actual price in the end, not how short it is. Minus 310, which is very short, but if it was, I don’t know, minus 250 or something, maybe we look to try and find an angle. But I think it’s dangerous to try and oppose this Fullham team. Yes, of course you expect Arsenal to win, because they’ve got the better players, but trying to find a value bet, I don’t think there’s one here. I think we want to probably be with Arsenal, but don’t think we want to back Arsenal minus 1.5 at minus money. Probably don’t want to back Arsenal to clear two and a half goals, either. And then we see a goal line of three with minus money for overs, and it’s kind of all the angles maybe we’d want to go for, Arsenal to win and goals in the game. But I think the market’s already covered us there. So I think, yeah, better bets in other matches, as we’ve already discussed this weekend.

Flash:

Mark O’Hare, Arsenal have actually started games really well, but they’ve played Bourmouth, who basically played an under nine side against a men’s side at the end of season, like kids versus parents. It was an absolute joke. They’ve played against a Leicester side who have also proved that they can’t keep their backdoor shut, and they’re shipping goals. So where are this Arsenal side? Because the one thing they have done is score early.

Mark:

Yeah. Where are they? I think they’re on the nice sort of path now back to being in contention for the top four. They’re playing with confidence. There’s a lot of continuity in the team. They’ve managed to pick the same styling 11 in all three matches. I think there’s an understanding there, there’s desire. Character wise, I think they’ve certainly shown a bit of leadership too, but bigger tests are to come for us now they’ve got an awkward September and where they have to return to European football, as well. And that will certainly disrupt things, playing on Thursday nights. But for now, I think they’re in a good spot, and I think they should be capable of beating Fullham with a bit of room to spare, really. This is a newly promoted Fullham team and yeah, of course they’ve impressed in the first three games, they are unbeaten. But I still think there’s elements of weakness in this Fullham team.

I admire what they’ve done in the transfer window, particularly in central midfield. But I think you look at the center halfs who have been performing above expectations, but Reman Aderabio, I think they can be pulled apart by someone like Gabriel Jesus. And if Arsenal play with the same sort of intensity that they have done so far, then yeah, I expect them to possibly score early and win this game with room to spare. This tends to be where Arsenal come to the party at home against bottom half teams, talked about it millions of times, but they’ve got a 68% win record since 2018 at home to bottom half teams. And that increases to 70% when hosting teams as minus money favorites. So yeah, I expect them to get their job done. I just don’t expect it to be the sort of goal frenzy that potentially the market does.

I think that goal line is really hard to get minus money on over three. So you’re getting minus money, basically need four goals to be paid out at minus money. It’s not really for me. I looked at Arteta’s record at home in the Premier League, this goes across all matches. They played 49 home league games under Arteta. Only five of those have featured five goals or more. So I was tempted by Arsenal under four and a half goals, but the price isn’t great. So I’ve left it alone. Defensively, the gunners have been very, very strong, and although Alexander Mitrovic is creating plenty of headlines scoring goals and influencing matches, particularly later on against Brentford, he has missed a catalog of opportunities, too. And I don’t think he’s going to get that in many chances against this Arsenal defense.

Flash:

I don’t think we can go anywhere near clean sheets here. I mean, you know a lap and Arsenal will end up winning three-one. My angle, though, is I think Arsenal will win the game. I think Arsenal will score early. I’ve gone with Arsenal halftime, fulltime. That is my official pick, because the one thing I’ve seen with Arsenal is that they’re playing two touch football. They’re shifting it, but they’re also mixing it up as well and trying to turn sides. I think Fullham, yeah, they may get a goal. Wouldn’t want to go near the plus 105 for them not to score. But if we look at the official picks, I think Arsenal have got maybe five or six different players who are actually getting into the box. So I’ve gone half time, full time minus 105. I thought this was close to being my absolute banker, or you just go with Arsenal money line halftime. But then you look at it, it’s like twice worse value.

So at minus 105, I mean, if Arsenal are winning at halftime, they win the game, because then Fullham are going to come out and Arsenal will expose them. So I’ve got Arsenal scoring early, and I’ve got Arsenal at halftime full-time, not minus 105. Okay. Let’s move from London to the Midlands, because our next game, game number five, is Wolves versus Newcastle. Wolves are not always involved in games with goals. Newcastle last week were like the Harlem Globetrotters, and were very unlucky not to beat Manchester City, scoring three, but they let in three. Could have been five all. Wolves are massive at plus 175, but are Newcastle a trap at plus 170? The pick them, draw no bet might be the way to go if you fancy a side, or you look at the bottom and go draw plus 230 and move on. Mark O’Hare, do you have a firm thought on this game? Because Wolves tie, Newcastle away from home tie. I really couldn’t split these.

Mark:

Yeah, it’s an ugly game, and I don’t expect it to be particularly entertaining. Wolves finished above Newcastle last season. I’d be surprised if that happens this time around. The underlying metrics suggested that they flattered to finish 10th last season, and their lack of firepower let them down. And all the talk through the summer was Wolves were going to try and implement a new look, style, play much more attacking football, change the system. And obviously that’s led to Connor Cody leaving the club, but they’ve not scored. And since the sixth minute of the opening weekend, they lost that match two-one at Leeds. They’ve since drawn nil-nil with Fullham, and missed a penalty. Could have lost that game, obviously. Been a decent shift at Spurs, but still managed to lose the game one-nil. And if you look at their shot stats, they look pretty decent. They’re averaging around 14 per game, but look where they’re taking those shots from.

BArely any of those efforts are coming from sort of meaningful or positions of threat. They’re actually averaging the third fewest shots in the box behind Leicester and Bourmouth, which is saying something, really. And I know they’re a work in progress, and I do expect Gonza Laguedes to make a bit of a difference, but I’m not convinced with him leading the line. I do like Matteus Nunez, a fantastic signing in the field, made a fantastic debut against the Spurs, but ultimately, are they going to of shift things dramatically against the Newcastle team, who I think are much more reliable when playing at St James’s Park, and actually quite poor if you look at that process away from time side under Eddie How? I think Wolves are probably understandably reasonable underdogs here. I think you could make a case for them, but what I’ve tried to do here is, as I said at the start, I don’t expect this game to be massively entertaining.

So I’m going to attack the halftime draw, which I think is a reasonable price here, sort of plus money. It’s a selection that has actually one in 60% of Bruno Larsh’s matches in charge of Wolves. So, won in all three of their Premier League games so far this season, and if you look at the XG figures for first half only, Wolves matches are by far and away the most dreary games in terms of the first 45 minutes so far this season. Newcastle aren’t a million miles away, either. They’ve seen halftime draws in 16 of 30 games under How, and they’ve actually only trailed at half time in five times, as well. And it’s get bettors one and two of their three games already this season. So, not expecting entertainment. I think it could be quite a slow burner, really and therefore I thought the price from the halftime draw was decent enough to take.

Flash:

Over the last three seasons, Stinch, it’s been draw half time in any Wolves game, home or away. I mean, you say 60% Bruno Larsh, before that, it was probably around 70%. Every single week, Wolves, don’t care where you’re playing, draw half time. Now you’re getting plus 100.

Stinch:

Yeah, I think Wolves, as I mentioned, are moving away from the five at the back system, gone to four in defense now. And I think they’re trying to be more attacking. So I think maybe have to wait and see how that will affect them going forward. I mean, Mark mentioned as well, they haven’t scored a goal since the eighth minute of the opening day of the season, I think. Not for, as he says, their lack of trying in terms of shots, but ultimately in overall quality, it’s just not been there. But they are trying to adjust and change to this new template going forward. Obviously they brought in Giancarlo Guedes from Valencia, Rao Jimenez is now back from injury. But they were starting the season with Morgan Gibbs White, who’s since moved to Nottingham Forest. So it just goes to show that the selection’s not been settled.

So I kind of want to give them a few more games, really, to see how it’s going to affect them. But I mean, if I was forced to have a bet, yeah, I think I’d love to get Wolves on side, seeing as they’re chalked up as underdogs. I know Newcastle are posting good results, but a lot of them games they’ve won by the margin of one goal. It’s been slim, really. Obviously putting a good performance last week against Man City, but I think we all kind of recognize that Man City underperformed, and we remember the two weeks before they went away to Brighton, Newcastle and had just four shots. Lucky to pick up a nil-nil draw, thanks to Nick Pope. So also kind of similar with Newcastle. We know they’ve got unlimited funds, that they’re bringing in new players regularly. So yeah, again, just really a watch and brief to see how these teams are going to adjust to these new players and new formations.

One thing I will say, and Mark kind of touched upon it as well, generally the games between these two since they’ve both been back in the Premier League, have been very, very dull. I think six of the eight meetings have finished one- one. So it’s kind of no wonder that the unders is as short as it is. I mean, you wouldn’t want to backend is at minus 135, given that what we see from both teams is to try and be a little bit more on the front foot. So what I would say is, probably don’t bother watching this match.

Flash:

Or no, but sometimes it’s good to watch these type of games, because it will maybe give us a little bit of value elsewhere or in weeks to come. I like the draw at plus 230, as well. Maybe draw-draw might be a way to go, but let’s have a little look at the official picks. Because Wolves can’t really go for it, because Newcastle strength is on the break, the counter. They’ve got good pace, and they’ve got good players. Draw half time at plus 100. Mark O’Hare seems to be right on the money at the moment, and his record is showing that as well. Pond de Leon, he’s a Wolves fan and he’s in the chat. He’s a rail back now. Didn’t have a center forward before, though, Mark. I think he’s talking up his team’s chances. But even when you talk up these two teams’ chances, you come back to, maybe this is going to be a draw.

So I mean nil-nil, one-one, as long as we get… For us, it’s getting the draw at half time. Okay. Let’s go to our sixth and final game with a peak. Remember, there’s a Q&A if you’ve got any other questions from games we didn’t even cater for. So it’s Forest versus Topnam, and Forest at plus 600, Spurs at minus 210, which seems very stingy. Forest plus one plus money as well, 115. I want to look at Forest. Under half a goals, so Forest not to score, is at plus 110. The draw is at plus 360. Mark O’Hare, you can go first, because you’ve picked up money in the first few weeks on having Forest double chance, Forest plus 0.5. This is their biggest test.

Mark:

That was Stinch.

Flash:

Yeah. Stinch.

Mark:

As much as I’d like to take his winners.

Flash:

Oh, did I say Mark?

Mark:

Yeah.

Flash:

Stinch, sorry. I forgot your first name was Mark.

Stinch:

No worries. No worries. You want me to crack on?

Flash:

Yeah, I do want you to crack on, because you love Forest.

Stinch:

Yeah. Yeah. I’ve been a huge fan of Forest in terms of the fact that the market’s basically underrated them. They rated them as the worst team in the league alongside Bourmouth, pretty much. And I don’t believe that’s how the season will play out. I think Forest will probably finish 14, 15, 13, something around that mark. So that’s why I’ve been trying to get with them. Had success in two of the three games, which is good to show a profit, but this week I’ve kind of left them alone, despite the fact that I do think that plus 600 looks really, really big. And as you mentioned, that minus 210 on Tottenham is stingy away from home. But the thing with Tottenham is they have world class finishers in Cane and Song. We talk about expected goals, these sorts of things, to try and better analyze a game, and Cane and Song are fantastic at making those sort of stats look stupid, essentially, because they’re so good at finishing.

And normally my route here would be to try and take Forest on the handicap plus one, but I can just see that looking stupid come full time, and Tottenham easily, not easily, but perhaps coming away with a two-nil victory or something, because we’ve seen Forest in the game so far. And I’m happy to give them a bit of leeway, because they’re betting in new players, but they have been conceding lots of shots away.

Flash:

61 shots in the first three games.

Stinch:

Yeah. Yeah. I mean, that’s not healthy, is it? Over 20 a game on average? So that’s why I’m happy to take a pass here, and just to see how they continue to evolve, but don’t get me wrong. Long term, I think Forest will be absolutely fine. But you mentioned there about Forest shipping shots. Last week, Tottenham at home to Wolves, the Wolves team that we’re not that impressed with, Wolves had 20 shots. So it just goes to show that Tottenham perhaps, not really sure what was wrong with them last week, because they’re at home. Expect them to be on the front foot, but they struggled, and just got away with the one year win in the end. So yeah, I think it’s very interesting, and we’ve only got three games of the season. So we have another game here, and I think this is a good watch on a Sunday afternoon, because I think this will tell us a lot more about both of these teams and maybe a little bit more long term, how their style of play is going to evolve.

Flash:

And also just, I know it’s a bit of useless information, but they got drawn against each other as well in the third round of the Caravel Cup. For me, Mark O’Hare, I’ve got this as the biggest physical matchup for Forest that they’ve experienced so far. Also, the movement of the front boys for Spurs. I’m not sure that this Forest defense is going to be equipped to stop them, to be honest. And as far as going forward, I’ve seen every game, they’re toothless, and Stinch has got away with murder betting this team.

Mark:

Yeah, I think it’s a bit of an exaggeration. I think they haven’t been as good as we probably expect them to be.

Flash:

Well, hold on a minute. A bit of an exaggeration? Against West Ham, they came out, missed a penalty, hit the bar three times, and their goal came off a West Ham defender, kicking it away, hit the striker and went in. And he ran away as if he’d like Robby Renson Brink, had shot from 45 yards. By the way, he used to play for Holland in the seventies. Sorry, Mark O’Hare.

Mark:

Yeah. I think Forest at home, what we can’t sort of calculate is the impact of the city ground crowd. And we certainly saw that in the first half against West Ham, where Forest really could have put West Ham to bed before half time, and I had the Hammers back in with those opportunities. But yeah, to have four points on the board is probably kind considering their performances so far, but they’ll be gutted they dropped points at Everton last week. And they got Spurs now, and in Man City thereafter. So it’s a really testing time for Forest. I do expect them to be good. And good enough to stay in this division once they have their time to sort of bet in this new look squad, but Stinch touched about it, and you both have, actually, about the shots conceded. 19 against Everton, 19 against West Ham, 23 against Newcastle. 35 shots from inside the penalty area as well, and 23 on target.

It just goes to show how crucial Dean Henderson has been this season, because in expected goals terms, for us to have conceded over 5.5 XG and they’ve only shipped three goals. So that is a concern, particularly when you’re coming up against a really smart and attacking unit like Tottenham, who have a good record traveling to teams in the bottom half. Their record at teams in [inaudible 00:46:21] below under Contay is six wins, three draws, one defeat, seven clean sheets from 10. Very strong stuff. But yeah, I expect Spurs to do a job here, but the price for them to win was too short for me to entertain. I did consider backing Spurs to win and under four and a half goals, but I’ve left it alone, just because I think if the price from Tottenham to win on the money line is too small, it probably will be under four and a half goals as well.

So yeah, I’ve not been overwhelmed by Tottenham so far. I think they did enough and did what was required against Southampton the opening day, second best against Chelsea, and then underwhelming against Wolves as well for large parts of last week before the second half, at least. So they probably got another gear or two, and Contay said himself that he’s more than happy with their points return, considering those are matches they dropped points in last season. So different tests this weekend, and just well aware that the sort of intangibles of the city ground crowd could will Forest on to improve their performances. But ultimately, I think Tottenham will be too good.

Flash:

Oh, no doubt. And I have no doubt that Spurs will be too good. In a physical matchup you’ve got to favor the away side at an absolute canter. I’m not sure Forest will bother the, because I don’t think they’ll win the midfield battle. That’s the big one. I think Spurs are going to completely dominate this game, and my official pick can flick up anytime it likes because I’m so comfortable with this. And I said earlier about win to nils, well, this is one I definitely think is win to nil. I don’t see Forest scoring. So instead of getting Forest not to score at plus 105, I’m gone with Spurs to win to nil at plus 150, and it was nearly going to be my banker. So anyway, Spurs, win to nil at plus 150. Now would be a good time to flick up the prop of the week, because I just couldn’t believe that this was a possible price, because my prop of the week is in the same game.

It’s Cane anytime goal score at plus 100. I think there could easily see a penalty in this game, which I expect him to step up and score. If you are talking about an average of 20 shots or 20 chances in a game, and you’ve got Harry Cane sitting in the middle against this Forest back line, then you’re giving me plus 100 for him to get on the end of one of them? Three kicks on the edge of the box, because they’re feet and they’re so strong? I really like this. I mean, I would like to have this on my own card, but I had to give you a prop of the week. Mark O’Hare, Cane plus 100, no brainer?

Mark:

Yeah. I think anytime Harry Cane’s plus money, you got to sort of take an interest there. Scored last week, and had plenty of opportunities, too. So yeah, normally the rule is don’t back Cane in August, isn’t it? But I think he’s already sort of scoffed that, so yeah, I wouldn’t disagree.

Flash:

Yeah. I wrote that. I wrote that in a tweet when Chelsea were two-one up, and there was 30 seconds to go. I remember I had two-two in that Chelsea Spurs go, and I wrote, ah, so Cane not to score in August is a thing. Cross come over, edit it up. I had to press delete very quickly, Mark Stincho.

Stinch:

How many goals did you score in August, Flash? Were you an August player, or you saved yourself to the end of the season?

Flash:

No, I scored a couple, I think. A few. Yeah. I scored at Wimbledon away once, we won one-nil, 85th minute. Nice. And people think, Wimbledon? Oh, it was a tough place to go. Don’t worry about that. But yeah, we won one-nil, and I scored.

Stinch:

Nice, nice. I mean, I think Cane, this time of the season, needs to be pushing himself, not into England contention, but into England readiness. Ready for that World Cup that’s coming up, that’ll be here in no time, won’t it? We’re talking week in, week out, we’re nearly in September, and November’s not too far away. So yeah, he’ll want to be there. He’ll want to be going into that tournament firing on all cylinders, won’t he?

Flash:

So now is the time to get yourselves typing for a Q&A. While you do that, I’ll remind you we’re America’s favorite sports book for a reason. Our prop lines, by the way, and I’ve been talking to our line makers, and we’re going to come up with something new next Wednesday. Basically, it’ll be under the specials board, but it’ll be an in-game parlay. We’ll select a couple of games, see if you like it. If you like it, then it might grow. If you don’t like it, then we won’t do it. But I’d like you to subscribe. Also, I’d like you to ring the bell, which means you’ll never miss any content again. And if you’re on social media, then follow @betus.TV, because every single sport will be covered on there. And I’ll give you a little roll call of what you’ve got coming up after we do the Q&A.

Press the link in description for the shirt contest to enter. There is going to be four given away, six or seven days to go. Now’s the time, though, for the Q&A, and the first one that I saw someone write was Alexander Esak to Newcastle. Mark O’Hare, you can take this one.

Mark:

Yeah, I think it’s a reasonable move. I think 12 months ago, there’d be a lot more clubs around Europe who had been chasing him and keen to make that deal happen. What’s happened since then? Well, he’s actually not been the most prolific or proficient in La Ligua, but I do think he’s got the skill set to thrive, and he’s only 22 years old. So you’d expect him to improve with the right coaching and the right environment. I think he’s got a bag of tricks. He’s rangy, he’s pacey. He’s got ability in the air, works well as a link man and can lead the line on his own. So yeah, he’s got all the skill set to thrive in the Premier League. I’m just wondering how Newcastle are going to use him, or where they’re going to use him. Obviously, Canner Wilson isn’t always the most reliable in terms of fitness. So potentially there’s straight away an opportunity for him to slot into the team, but he’s an upgrade on someone like Chris Wood, at least. So, he does improve Newcastle’s scored, and I expect him to be a pretty decent striker in the league.

Flash:

Okay. Mark Stinchcombe, Harry Docker has basically, no, Sean Mack has gone for Chelsea and under four and a half versus Leicester.

Stinch:

I’m not confident in Chelsea winning a game of football, to honest, at the moment, given, I think we mentioned at the beginning of the show, they’ve got rid of Verna, they’ve got rid of Lucarko. They haven’t actually got a natural striker, and have looked quite toothless. I mean, we watched that game opening weekend of the season, didn’t we, away at Everton, where they struggled to break Everton down, needed a lucky penalty. And yeah, last week against Leeds, they didn’t offer a lot going forward at all. The bet I actually quite like in this match is both teams to score around about minus 120. 24 of Leicester’s last 27 away games, we’ve seen both teams score, which is a huge strike rate given those odds. And Leicester, for all their problems defensively, still got tons of attacking talent in Vadi, Madison, Ian Acho, Dacker, Harvey Barnes, Perez, et cetera. So yeah, I quite like both teams scoring that match rather than trying to pick Chelsea out to win.

Flash:

Stinch, do we know what was wrong with Cantaine, Covecic last week? Because boy, did they miss them.

Stinch:

I don’t know, but as far as I’m aware, they’re still injured, and obviously Cooler Baile will be suspended. So I think Chelsea are a bit vulnerable defensively with the departures of Rudiger and Christenson.

Flash:

Midfield, they got absolutely torn to pieces. Okay. We’ll take another one. Vlad’s saying, what about Palace plus two? Surely, Palace don’t get beat by three, Mark O’Hare.

Mark:

You say that, but they’re going into the Etsy had against Man City, and I think the line’s probably fair enough, really-

Flash:

Yeah, Mark, I’ve got another question. Forget who ever said that. Who said that, anyway? Vlad. Forget his. My question’s far more important. What the hell is Carl Walker doing playing in midfield? He’s like a fish up a tree.

Mark:

Yeah, it’s Pep Guardia, isn’t it? You don’t really know what his grand plans are, but it tends to work most of the time. But when it does go wrong, it does tend to go very badly wrong. So yeah, I think City, speed bump, really, wasn’t it, against Newcastle? I don’t think they’re anticipating the sort of forward thinking approach of the geordies in that game. So it probably set them back a couple of steps, but ultimately we’re talking about the best team on the planet, the champions league favorites, and you’ve got to expect them to be passed by a two goal margin or more, even if it’s just by two. So I think the line’s probably about right. I guess from a punting perspective, do I really want to back the underdog out the Etty has, even with a two goal start? It’s not going to be the most enjoyable bet to cheer on, even if the line, you think, is wrong.

So I think two goals is fair enough, really. I think that is the margin of where City are compared to a team like Paris, who are looking in sort of the middle third, mid table of the Premier League. I think they are two goals better at home than most of those teams, if not more. So I know the four-nil flattered them against Bourmouth, but you know, just look at the talent that they got available to them. I think it’s worth bearing in mind as a midweek round of fixtures to come to, and then the champions league. So potentially they do make changes after an hour if they’re comfortably ahead, and give Paris an opportunity to get back into the game, but it’s not a bet that I would take, just because it’s just not enjoyable to cheer on. So it’s what I’m happy to sort of leave alone.

Flash:

What about City and both teams to score? Is that a decent price, Stinch? Can you have a little look at that for me while I try and find another question? In fact, I won’t find another question. I’ll remind you that coming up, we’ve got Sierra Real and La Ligua today, and then tomorrow it’s Bunderslige. Then it’s the Travis Stakes from Saratoga, probably the best race I’ve seen all season. And then we are starting off with the US Open tennis from Flushing Meadows. On Monday, here we go again, because it’s the Premier League show with Mark O’Hare and Brad Thomas making his debut. Stinch has got a hair appointment, so he’s got to have them low lights put back in, and Sierra Real will be with Mina and Mattie, and then it’ll be champions league futures. So this is why you got to follow @betusTV, because we’ve got so many shows. And I’ve not even done the credit for the NCAA F boys, as well. They’re back. MLB, well, they’re just always there. They seem to play a million games a season. Price, Stinch, Man City.

Stinch:

Plus 160.

Flash:

Plus 160 for Man City to win and both teams to score?

Stinch:

Yep.

Flash:

Do we not like that, boys? With Zahar on the break, Ezzy, pace from Palace, here? Because they got absolutely shredded the other day just from a bit of pace. Do we not think that Man City win the game, but Palace score?

Stinch:

Well, Palace have done a job on the City, haven’t they? Last season, they went there and won two-nil. I think they’ve won there a couple of times recently, if I’m not wrong, Mark?

Mark:

Yeah, they have, yeah. Won on the Hodgson, as well.

Flash:

Yeah, [inaudible 00:57:06]. And they did a job at Old Trafford, as well, when Man United weren’t as bad as they were up until last week. Princeton says, Flash, do you think Liverpool win both halves? They’re playing against Bourmouth. If they don’t, then there’s something really going wrong. And I know that Liverpool’s midfield is all over the shop, and by the way, we told you. Sadhi Omany, well, it’s all good for us to tell him now before Liverpool go on a 35 game win streak, but he is such an important player to any side that he’s in, because he is just proper class. Wharton says, when’s Bunderslige? I just said, is there an echo? Tomorrow morning, 10 Eastern. Okay. Stinch, you get your feet up, son. I know you want to have a day off. Mark O’Hare, no day off for you.

I will see you Monday, twice. So I’ll see you for the Premier League show. And I will see you for the champions league futures, which the Champion’s league draw is just about to happen maybe in the next couple of hours. So really, really looking forward to that. Everyone in the chat, thumbs up on the way out, if you would, and remember to follow @betusTV, because any in-play selections will be there. Man City to win and both teams to score. Plus 160. I think I may well be adding that. Let’s have a little look at the best bets, please. Mark, these boys are saving up, but that’s why they’re in profit. Brentford moneyline plus 100, Wolves Newcastle draw half time plus 100. I’m liking these. Man United, over one and a half goals, plus 100. To get that, just go to betus.com and do that ASAP.

Mark:

That’s a banker.

Flash:

Oh yeah. That’s a banker, is it? Did you put little stars above it?

Stinch:

I did indeed.

Flash:

I thought you did. Brentford team total over one and a half. So Brentford score twice at minus 105. Tottenham win to nil at plus 150, Arsenal halftime, fulltime minus 105, and Brighton and under four and a half, at plus 110. And your prop of the week should be the banker, Cane anytime scorer at plus 100 against the Forest side that let 20 shots a game come in. I think you give me 20 shots, I’d be able to score. So Mark O’Hare, have a great weekend. Stinch, enjoy, and we’ll look forward to seeing you again. Are you okay for next Thursday? Or are you having your nails done or anything ill?

Stinch:

No, the haircut only takes a few minutes. I’ll be all good.

Flash:

Oh, you’ll be back. You’ll be back. Huh? Next Thursday, you’ll be back.

Stinch:

Yeah. With some more profits.

Flash:

Yeah. Good man. And some more winners, no doubt. Okay. From everyone at Bet US, have a great weekend. You take care.

BetUS Sportsbook & Casino
Average rating:  
 0 reviews

Show More

Related Tags

HLTV BLAST.tv